<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenStreetMap vs. Google/TeleAtlas Street Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geoiq.com/2008/12/12/openstreetmap-vs-googleteleatlas-street-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geoiq.com/2008/12/12/openstreetmap-vs-googleteleatlas-street-coverage/</link>
	<description>News and updates from GeoIQ</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:55:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mulberry bags</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoiq.com/2008/12/12/openstreetmap-vs-googleteleatlas-street-coverage/#comment-3990</link>
		<dc:creator>Mulberry bags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 06:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fortiusone.com/?p=826#comment-3990</guid>
		<description>You had some nice points here. I done a research on the topic and got most peoples will agree with you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You had some nice points here. I done a research on the topic and got most peoples will agree with you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha Nulty</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoiq.com/2008/12/12/openstreetmap-vs-googleteleatlas-street-coverage/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha Nulty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 06:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fortiusone.com/?p=826#comment-775</guid>
		<description>It seems like you are producing difficulties your self by attempting to solve this matter rather than searching at why their is really a issue within the earliest location.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like you are producing difficulties your self by attempting to solve this matter rather than searching at why their is really a issue within the earliest location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nav4All stuurt persbericht de wereld in&#8230; &#171; OpenStreetMap NL</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoiq.com/2008/12/12/openstreetmap-vs-googleteleatlas-street-coverage/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Nav4All stuurt persbericht de wereld in&#8230; &#171; OpenStreetMap NL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fortiusone.com/?p=826#comment-774</guid>
		<description>[...] jullie &#8216;WC eend&#8217; detector ook aanstaat; is een onafhankelijke vergelijking ook op z&#8217;n [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] jullie &#8216;WC eend&#8217; detector ook aanstaat; is een onafhankelijke vergelijking ook op z&#8217;n [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The OpenStreetMap State of The Maps 2009 conference &#171; LocalLab : Foire aux Infos</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoiq.com/2008/12/12/openstreetmap-vs-googleteleatlas-street-coverage/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>The OpenStreetMap State of The Maps 2009 conference &#171; LocalLab : Foire aux Infos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fortiusone.com/?p=826#comment-773</guid>
		<description>[...] vs. Google/TeleAtlas Street Coverage 1 comment [+] Off The Map offers an interesting entry on worldwide comparison of OpenStreetMap vs TeleAtlas street coverage­. From the entry: &#8220;Alex’s original assessment was that OSM is slightly ahead of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vs. Google/TeleAtlas Street Coverage 1 comment [+] Off The Map offers an interesting entry on worldwide comparison of OpenStreetMap vs TeleAtlas street coverage­. From the entry: &#8220;Alex’s original assessment was that OSM is slightly ahead of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surveying OpenStreetMap in Africa&#160;&#124;&#160;Planet Street Map Mobile</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoiq.com/2008/12/12/openstreetmap-vs-googleteleatlas-street-coverage/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Surveying OpenStreetMap in Africa&#160;&#124;&#160;Planet Street Map Mobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fortiusone.com/?p=826#comment-772</guid>
		<description>[...] mappers, mappers on vacation, foreign nationals, and remote mapping using satellite imagery. A recent comparison judged that OSM had the most comprehensive coverage of Africa among web mapping services, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mappers, mappers on vacation, foreign nationals, and remote mapping using satellite imagery. A recent comparison judged that OSM had the most comprehensive coverage of Africa among web mapping services, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 824</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoiq.com/2008/12/12/openstreetmap-vs-googleteleatlas-street-coverage/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>824</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fortiusone.com/?p=826#comment-771</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://acquistoviagra.it&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;viagra&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://acquistoviagra.it" rel="nofollow">viagra</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23456</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoiq.com/2008/12/12/openstreetmap-vs-googleteleatlas-street-coverage/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>23456</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fortiusone.com/?p=826#comment-770</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://acquistoviagra.it&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;viagra&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://acquistoviagra.it" rel="nofollow">viagra</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Un anno di OpenStreetMap &#171; lucamenini.blog/</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoiq.com/2008/12/12/openstreetmap-vs-googleteleatlas-street-coverage/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Un anno di OpenStreetMap &#171; lucamenini.blog/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fortiusone.com/?p=826#comment-769</guid>
		<description>[...] Qui invece il confronto con GoogleMap. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Qui invece il confronto con GoogleMap. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Fairhurst</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoiq.com/2008/12/12/openstreetmap-vs-googleteleatlas-street-coverage/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fairhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fortiusone.com/?p=826#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Menno - well, it depends on what you compare. As a traditional streetmap for drivers, Google Maps is still ahead of OSM pretty much everywhere in the EU, you&#039;re right.

But OSM is ahead with cycle routes (www.opencyclemap.org), footpaths, and a bunch of other stuff not shown on Google Maps - even if you take the dreaded &#039;mashups&#039; into account. I can actually use OSM as a cycling or walking map in my area now; certainly can&#039;t say the same for Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Menno &#8211; well, it depends on what you compare. As a traditional streetmap for drivers, Google Maps is still ahead of OSM pretty much everywhere in the EU, you&#8217;re right.</p>
<p>But OSM is ahead with cycle routes (www.opencyclemap.org), footpaths, and a bunch of other stuff not shown on Google Maps &#8211; even if you take the dreaded &#8216;mashups&#8217; into account. I can actually use OSM as a cycling or walking map in my area now; certainly can&#8217;t say the same for Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Gorman</title>
		<link>http://blog.geoiq.com/2008/12/12/openstreetmap-vs-googleteleatlas-street-coverage/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fortiusone.com/?p=826#comment-767</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification Steve.  Look forward to seeing the new metrics. In the spirit of crowdsourcing another blog pointed out that Munich was accidentally geo-coded or mislabeled as Monaco.  Can&#039;t wait to get annotations on the map so the feedback is harnessed in a systematic manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification Steve.  Look forward to seeing the new metrics. In the spirit of crowdsourcing another blog pointed out that Munich was accidentally geo-coded or mislabeled as Monaco.  Can&#8217;t wait to get annotations on the map so the feedback is harnessed in a systematic manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

